DGGE Analysis
Amplify 200 base pairs of highly conserved bacterial DNA (16S rDNA) from
each sample
DNA unzips during DGGE as the denaturant (urea) becomes increasingly
concentrated in the gel
Each rung of the DNA ladder is composed of one base pair (AT or GC)
AT base pairs have fewer hydrogen bonds than GC base pairs
AT base pairs are more vulnerable in denaturing situations
Species with the most AT base pairs will unravel
earlier in the DGGE process, traveling less distance than species with more GC pairs
DGGE can detect differences of only 1 or 2 base pairs in 16S rDNA
Different species of bacteria are distinguished in this way
The relative dominance of a species within a community
is reflected in the width and intensity of the band on the gel (Figure 9)
Population changes can be monitored for each microcosm over time
Microbial populations in different environments can be compared
Example of large, dark bands,
indicating dominant species
Example of less prominent
bands, indicating a less-dominant species
Results
Stage 1:
Lake of the Woods near South Bend, Indiana
DGGE does not provide evidence for population change under the
experimental parameters
Tests conducted using a representative selection of samples
Changes may have occurred that are undetectable by DGGE
Results indicate a stable microbial community in Lake
of the Woods wetland sediments under the salinity ranges and environmental conditions tested
Techniques involving DNA isolation, polymerase chain
reaction (PCR), agarose gel electrophoresis, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) were
acquired
Stage 2: Phuket and Khao Lak,
Thailand
unable to transport sediment samples into the United States
Sediment collected in Washington due to the necessary shift in the
primary focus of study
Stage 3: Rooks Park near Walla
Walla, Washington
Experimental process from Stage 1 repeated
Microbial populations serve as a comparison for resilient microbial
populations in Indiana
Analysis of the DGGE product consistent with Stage 1 results
Populations in each simulated microhabitat maintain a
high level of diversity throughout time in each of the post-tsunami conditions
Stagnant and flowing freshwater systems
Seawater of various ionic strengths
Freshwater wetlands in Walla Walla, Washington appear
to have a stable microbial population after saltwater intrusion (Figure 10)
The Effect of Tsunamis on
Wetlands:
Monitoring Microbial Populations
Tamara L. Carley,
Whitman College. Jennifer R. Woertz and
Susan E.H. Sakimoto, University of Notre Dame.
Interdisciplinary
Studies in Tsunami Impacts and Mitigation. Research Experience for
Undergraduates. University of Notre
Dame, Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences. Summer 2006.
Special thanks to
the National Science Foundation and the Department of Defense for making this
research possible through the funding of NSF Grant #EEC-0552432.
With gratitude to
Stefen J. Green, Robert Nerenberg, Margaret Dudley, and Tina Mitchell at the
University of Notre Dame.
Objective
The objective of this research is to better understand
the impact of tsunamis upon microbial
communities in coastal freshwater wetlands.
Introduction
Tsunamis can generate major disruptions in water
quality and ecosystem health within
coastal surface and near-surface freshwater systems as a result of rapid salinity changes.
Bacteria are important indicators of overall ecosystem health, as environmental stress can be reflected in their genetic
diversity and abundance. To date, little is known of the particular impact of rapid
seawater inundation as an environmental
stress upon microbial populations in wetlands.
Approach
This study simulates the impact of seawater rapidly
inundating freshwater wetlands, specifically
the impact rapid saline influx upon bacterial communities. Sediment samples from freshwater wetlands in Lake of the Woods
near South Bend, Indiana and
Rooks Park near Walla Walla, Washington are used to establish baseline communities of microbes. These study cases act as an
analogue for sediment and microbes
found in freshwater wetlands in the southern province of Thailand that were flooded by the tsunami resulting from the M9.0
Sumatra-Andaman Islands earthquake
of December 2004 (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Khao Lak in the province of Phang-nga, approximately
100 km north of Phuket.
More than 1000 people died and 80 percent of the area
suffered damage as a result of the December 26, 2004 Sumatra-Andaman tsunami. Circled areas are wetlands that were
inundated by the tsunami event. Images
are approximately 8 km in
length.
Space Imaging: Centre for Remote Imaging, Sensing, and
Processing. Singapore.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/thailand/khaolak-imagery.htm
Three Stages of
Research
Stage 1: Lake of the Woods near
South Bend, Indiana
Establish and verify the experimental design
Demonstrate that approach is feasible with our sample populations
Prepare to repeat the experiment in a tsunami-zone environment
Stage 2: Phuket and Khao Lak,
Thailand (Figures 2 and 3)
Collect samples from 7 freshwater wetlands near the Andaman Sea
5 sample sites were inundated by the 2004 tsunami
2 sites were unaffected by the 2004 event
Thailand samples have not yet arrived in America for analysis
Stage 3: Rooks Park near Walla
Walla, Washington (Figure 4)
To serve as a basis for comparison for Indiana microbial population responses to a simulated tsunami, in lieu of Thailand
data
Experimental Design
Tsunami conditions are replicated by
inundating model wetlands with artificial
seawater of low (10 ppt), moderate (30 ppt) and high (50 ppt) salinity (Figure 6).
Surface and substrate sediment samples are used to create microhabitats that replicate different environmental
conditions (Figure 5). A stagnant
system simulates standing water in the wake of a tsunami (Figure 8). A flowing
freshwater system simulates natural processes such as precipitation, percolation, and surface flow to purge
intrusive saltwater from wetlands
(Figure 7). In all, 22 microcosms were constructed to simulate post-tsunami scenarios.
Figure
5
Experimental
design for environmental conditions in the wetland microcosms


Salinity:
Theoretical and Experimental
Figure
8
Stagnant
model wetland system with standing saltwater
Figure
7
Flowing system designed to purge model wetlands
of saltwater
and to slowly introduce freshwater
Figure
6
Salinity of simulated
seawater used
to inundate model wetlands


Figure
2
Sampling
site in Khao Lak, Thailand
Figure
3
Sampling
site in Phuket, Thailand
Figure
9
Examples
of diversity within microbial
populations. Each vertical
band represents DNA from
a different microcosm.

Day 1,
substrate control, prior to inundation
Day 1,
substrate control, 2 hours after inundation
Day 1,
substrate control, 8 hours after inundation
Day 1,
substrate sediment, stagnant system, medium salinity
Day 1,
substrate sediment, stagnant system, high salinity
Day 1,
substrate sediment, stagnant system, medium salinity
Day 1, surface
sediment control
Day 1, surface
sediment, flow-through system, high salinity
Day 1, surface
sediment, stagnant system, high salinity
Day 1, surface
sediment, stagnant system, medium salinity
Day 1, surface
sediment, stagnant system, medium salinity
Day 7,
substrate sediment control
Day 7,
substrate sediment, flow-through system, medium salinity
Day 7,
substrate sediment, stagnant system, high salinity
Day 7,
substrate sediment, substrate sediment, medium salinity
Day 7, surface
sediment control
Day 7, surface
sediment, flow-through system, high salinity
Day 7, surface
sediment, stagnant system, high salinity
Day 7, surface
sediment, stagnant system, medium salinity
DescriptionAll
Samples from Rooks Park
Figure
10
Stage
3 DGGE Results
The
DGGE gel was created using 19 samples
of 16S rDNA isolated from microcosms
created using sediment from Rooks
Park in Washington. Note the consistency in the location, width, and intensity of bands, each of which represents a bacterial species. Microbial diversity is abundant in each sample, under different post-tsunami conditions.
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
B
C
E
D
F
G
H
A
I



Collect sediment
samples from microcosms on a regular schedule following the seawater inundation event
Extract and purify DNA
that is highly conserved in all bacteria, with variations of only one or two base pairs between species
Use Mobio
"powersoil" DNA extraction kits
Conduct Polymerase
Chain Reaction (PCR)
Amplify portions of
16S rDNA genes using primer sets targeting bacteria
Run electrophoresis
with PCR product on 2% agarose gels
Visualize the
migration of DNA across a charged field
Determine
which samples are of sufficient quality and quantity for denaturing gradient
gel electrophoresis (DGGE)
Conduct DGGE using a 20-70% denaturant gradient for 17 hours at 60Ί C and 100
volts
Monitor changes in bacterial community structure over time and under
different environmental
conditions
Initial vulnerability
Gradual decline
Established dominance
Population rebound

Figure
4
Sampling
site in Washington


Discussion
Though results are consistent for two stages of study,
we are hesitant to say that microbial populations in freshwater wetlands are unaffected by tsunamis and
rapid saltwater inundation. A number of significant variables such as temperature, pH, organic content,
wave impact, and pollution were not factored into this study, though these would be pertinent in a
natural setting. It will be worthwhile to repeat this experiment using sediment samples collected in coastal
areas, as these will be better representative of microbial populations in tsunami-prone regions (which
may be more or less resilient than our inland wetland sample populations).